Characterization of Classic Meningioma with Use of Conventional Magnetic Resonance and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Abstract
Introduction: The conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method is widely considered ‘with limited success’ in differentiating the meningioma types but may fail to localize the tumor occupation of white-matter fiber bundles accurately. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is considered as an imaging modality that may elucidate the microstructure of brain tumors. We provide characteristics of meningioma using DTI-based-three-dimensional tracing of white matter to portray meningioma in a noninvasive approach and its structural contact to contiguous tumors and elucidate the influence of occupying lesions on white-matter fiber bundles.
Case Presentation: A 28-year-old female presented with visuospatial disturbances and persistent headaches for 2 years. Conventional and advanced MRI studies were performed. Diffusion-weighted Images (DWI) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values were measured in the lesion using routine MRI sequences. Advanced MRI using DTI was also performed. Conventional MRI outcomes showed tumor parenchyma, peritumoral edema, and compression on the circumnavigated brain tissue. There was hyperintense on DW trace image and isointense on ADC map. On T2-weighted image (T2WI) and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) images, there was an increased signal intensity that demonstrated an extra-axial lesion, while T1-weighted imaging signals showed hypointensity. DTI fractional anisotropy (FA) marker is an unclear optic radiation in the concerned area, indicating the shift or destruction of the optic radiation. The mean FA values of solid-enhancing areas of meningioma were 0.28 ± 0.17. Mean ADC values (103 mm2/s) were 0.764 ± 0.172.
Conclusions: Classic meningioma in this case has low intratumoral FA and high ADC. DTI displayed that intratumoral microscopic water motion is disorganized.
Keywords
DOI: 10.33371/ijoc.v18i3.1133
Article Metrics


References
Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Gittleman H, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016. Neuro Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;21(Suppl 5):v1-v100.
Nagesh V, Tsien CI, Chenevert TL, et al. Radiation-induced changes in normal-appearing white matter in patients with cerebral tumors: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 15;70(4):1002-10.
Lin L, Bhawana R, Xue Y, et al. Comparative Analysis of Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Grading and Assessing Cellular Proliferation of Meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Jun;39(6):1032-1038.
Zikou A, Alexiou GA, Goussia A, et al. The role of diffusion tensor imaging and dynamic susceptibility perfusion MRI in the evaluation of meningioma grade and subtype. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2016 Jul;146:109-15.
Romani R, Tang WJ, Mao Y, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the consistency of intracranial meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Oct;156(10):1837-45.
Sundgren PC, Fan X, Weybright P, et al. Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions. Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Nov;24(9):1131-42.
Huntoon K, Toland AMS, Dahiya S. Meningioma: A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects. Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 23;10:579599.
Aslan K, Gunbey HP, Tomak L, Incesu L. The diagnostic value of using combined MR diffusion tensor imaging parameters to differentiate between low- and high-grade meningioma. Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20180088.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.