Comparison of Electrons and Photons Treatment Plans in Medulloblastoma Patients

Muhammad Usman Ghani, Aasia Razzaq, Nauman Amjad, Ismat Fatima

Abstract


Background: The treatment of medulloblastoma involves surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant chemotherapy. In radiotherapy, craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is prescribed, where two lateral cranial fields and one or two spinal beams are applied in CSI. Different multi-field techniques (coplanar and/or noncoplanar) are used to register the prescribed dose. The purpose of this study was to assess plan quality in terms of dose coverage of the spine with both photon and electron beam therapy and the sparing of organs at risks (OARs).

Methods: Ten pediatric patients (ages 6 to 10 years) were immobilized in the prone position for simulation. The Clinical Target Volume (CTV) of the organ under treatment, Planning Target volume (PTV) of the organ under treatment, and OARs were contoured. Prowess Panther (v4.71) was used for dose computations. Two lateral parallel-opposed 6 MV photon cranial fields with the spinal beam(s) (either 6 Photons or 21 MeV electrons) were used in planning. Electron beams were added posteriorly on the spine with parallel-opposed cranial fields. The treatment plans were computed for 3600 c Gy in 21 fractions.

Results: For comparable conformity number of electron versus photons beam plans (0.68 ± 0.41 versus 0.66 ± 0.47, is not significantly different at p < 0.05) and homogeneity index (1.22 ± 0.03 versus 1.25 ± 0.04, is significantly different at p < 0.05), the photon doses were higher for underlying OARs (heart, liver, and thyroid) and were lower for partially in-field organs (lungs and kidneys) compared to electrons.

Conclusions: The underlying organs i.e., thyroid, heart, and liver receive a lesser dose in case of electrons, while partially in-field organs are exposed more compared to photons mainly due to the ballooning effect in electrons. The study shows that both electrons and photons can be used for CSI. However, the electron may be preferred due to its better sparing of underlying structures.


Keywords


cancer, medulloblastoma, CSI, photons, electrons, radiotherapy

Full Text: View | Download

DOI: 10.33371/ijoc.v17i1.949

Article Metrics

Abstract View: 906,
PDF Download: 353
             

References


Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health; 2006.

World Health Organization. Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable: report of the third global survey on eHealth. World Health Organization; 2017 Mar 27.

Weil AG, Wang AC, Westwick HJ, et al. Survival in pediatric medulloblastoma: a population-based observational study to improve prognostication. J Neurooncol. 2017 Mar;132(1):99-107.

Barrett A, Morris S, Dobbs J, Roques T. Practical radiotherapy planning. CRC Press; 2009 Jun 26.

Chojnacka M, Skowrońska-Gardas A, Morawska-Kaczyńska M,. Craniospinal radiotherapy in children: Electron- or photon-based technique of spinal irradiation. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2010 Feb 18;15(1):21-4.

Slampa P, Pavelka Z, Dusek L, et al. Longterm treatment results of childhood medulloblastoma by craniospinal irradiation in supine position. Neoplasma. 2007;54(1):62-7.

Bentel GC. Radiation therapy planning. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996.

Dewit L, Van Dam J, Rijnders A,. A modified radiotherapy technique in the treatment of medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1984 Feb;10(2):231-41.

Maor MH, Fields RS, Hogstrom KR, van Eys J. Improving the therapeutic ratio of craniospinal irradiation in medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1985 Apr;11(4):687-97.

Khan FM, Gibbons JP. Khan's the physics of radiation therapy. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.

Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ammirati M, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: central nervous system cancers, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Nov 1;15(11):1331-45.

Paddick I. A simple scoring ratio to index the conformity of radiosurgical treatment plans. Journal of neurosurgery. 2000 Dec 1;93(supplement_3):219-22.

Korab-Chrzanowska EA, Pysklak SE, Czaja K, Chmiel A. Whole CNS radiotherapy–a modification of the lower spinal field to reduce organ doses in the abdominal cavity. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy. 2004;9(5):161-7.

Stokkevåg CH, Engeseth GM, Ytre-Hauge KS, et al. Estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer following paediatric cranio-spinal irradiation with electron, photon and proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;53(8):1048-57.

Myers P, Stathakis S, Gutiérrez AN, et al. Dosimetric comparison of craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) treatments using helical tomotherapy, Smartarc TM, and 3D conventional radiation therapy. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology. 2013 Feb 26;2(01):30.

Feuvret L, Noël G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Feb 1;64(2):333-42.

Zhang R, Howell RM, Giebeler A, et al. Comparison of risk of radiogenic second cancer following photon and proton craniospinal irradiation for a pediatric medulloblastoma patient. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Feb 21;58(4):807-23.

Halperin EC, Brady LW, Wazer DE, Perez CA. Perez & Brady's principles and practice of radiation oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013 May 6.

Landberg TG, Lindgren ML, Cavallin‐Ståhl EK, et al. Improvements in the radiotherapy of medulloblastoma, 1946–1975. Cancer. 1980 Feb 15;45(4):670-8.

Stokkevåg CH, Engeseth GM, Ytre-Hauge KS, et al. Estimated risk of radiation-induced cancer following paediatric cranio-spinal irradiation with electron, photon and proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2014 Aug;53(8):1048-57.

De B, Florez MA, Ludmir EB, et al. Late Effects of Craniospinal Irradiation Using Electron Spinal Fields for Pediatric Patients With Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jan 1;115(1):164-73.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.